Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Facebook Needs a Better Business Model

After all the hype of recent weeks around the Facebook offering, the actual day was a disappointment for investors. Fixed at a release price of $38 per share, it fell substantially below that on the next day. Estimates were that Mark Zuckerberg lost $2.2 Billion that day. But then, he can afford it.

One cannot guage an investment in the rush of its first couple of days on the market. There is just too much speculation going on and it will take some time for the investors to settle down to a more normal frame of mind. Then they will look more closely at two things - earnings and cash flow, and decide whether they will be able to get a reasonable return on investment, through dividends and growth. That's the investors, not the speculators and gamblers.

To gain earnings and cash flow, a company needs a good business model At this point, Facebook has a business model, but it is almost entirely based on advertising, which has gotten to be a tough market on the internet. It's difficult to get the attention of people, and ads have been expensive. One can expect internet ads to drop in price as the number of players continues to grow. Simple economics.

In order to excel in the earnings game, Facebook probably needs a stronger and more diverse business model. Something unique and maybe completely different than what it has done so far. Amazon and Google faced similar issues, when they started out. Both had to change their original business model in order to survive. Both succeeded quite well. Both got into products and services that were very different and unique compared to their original concept.

There seems little doubt that Facebook will make some changes. All that wealth can draw in a lot of creative resources and talent to design and implement those changes. So analyses like this recent article, which argue that the Facebook model is so bad it will fail and also bring down the rest of the Web are one-sided extrapolations of existing weaknesses, which surely will be addressed in some fashion. And others seeking out comparative metrics to support the value of Facebook also fail to take innovation into account.

For investors with a taste for risk, or for speculators, Facebook offers up a lot of potential. For more conservative, long term investors, it's a good time to wait it out and see what innovation takes place - what kind of business model Facebook builds for the long term.

1 comment:

Aegir said...

Hi Gerald

Interesting piece on Facebook. I agree with you that Facebook needs to adjust their business model. Also I think Wall st./Bay st. needs to do a better job at explaining in lamens terms to the retail investor how Facebook plans to generate cash flow.

There were other factors at play here however that made Facebook's IPO a disaster:

• I think that smart money understands that the average IPO underperforms the index by 23% and they were waiting until Facebook actually released earnings before they move capital into the stock.

• The NASDAQ had a complete technological meltdown which delayed trading because they mangled the opening print. This caused mass confusion because major investors did not receive trade execution reports for almost two hours. Because the NASDAQ is incompetent it made Facebook look like it wasn’t popping and that caused investors to hold off on buying.

• In addition the lead underwriter Morgan Stanley is being criticized for pricing Facebook too high. In fact there are reports today that while their sales team was pumping the stock the analysts were calling their high valued clients to tell them to hold off on buying because they had tweaked the numbers and their new valuation wasn’t worth $38.

• There was too much supply. More Facebook stock became available that no one was anticipating. Rumour is that Hedge Funds and Institutional Investors were getting last minute calls to tell them that there was extra stock available if they wanted it.

• Finally, during the road show in New York & Boston, Mark Zuckerberg was rumoured to be wearing a hoodie and couldn’t be found for the Q & A sessions. This might have spooked some big players.

Jaime